Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

Folks who read this blog may be wondering why we have seldom mentioneddogsbite.org , a blog dedicated to fostering hysteria about “pit bulls.”

Annie wrote:
http://www.nopitbullbans.com/debunking-dogsbi...
Debunking Dogsbite.org
June 24, 2010
Folks who read this blog may be wondering why we have seldom mentioneddogsbite.org , a blog dedicated to fostering hysteria about “pit bulls.” We have little mentioned the now infamous dogsbite.org because we didn’t think we had to. Honestly, we couldn’t conceive of anyone taking them or their witch hunt seriously. Their website is so poorly written and their “evidence” so spotty, we honestly didn’t think any elected official would actually stoop to cite their laughable “evidence” as reason to pass breed-specific legislation (BSL). Well, we were wrong, but luckily not terribly wrong since many politicos and the mainstream media appear to have wisely steered clear of dogsbite.org . Still, the fact that any municipal government – and there have been a few – or the media would citedogsbite.org with a straight face is a little alarming. So, let’s endeavor to do what has long been overdue: debunk dogsbite.org .
Forget for a moment that many court venues have ruled breed-specific legislation (BSL) unconstitutional or otherwise unlawful, the most recent being a January ruling in Toledo which declared Toledo’s BSL beyond the purview of home rule power. But what about all the worldwide evidence that BSL doesn’t work? For instance, Italy (article 1 and article 2) and the Netherlands both repealed their BSL within the last couple of years citing its ineffectiveness. It has also been widely reported in the BBC that the UK’s 1991 Dangerous Dog Act has been a phenomenal failure since there has been a huge rise in banned breeds in the UK. And just last month, the Toronto Humane Society, in a survey of cities, released statistics revealing that “Ontario’s 2005 ban on “pit bull” breeds or dogs that resemble pit bulls has not made any difference in the number of dog bites.”
Now I would call the Toronto Humane Society’s findings a pretty good indicator that Toronto’s “pit bull” ban is ineffective since the ban didn’t accomplish what it set out to do: reduce dog bites. Yet dogsbite.org appears to see it differently based on their inclusion of Toronto in a list of supposedly successful BSL cities (this from their rather vague June 21 “press release“):
On June 18, DogsBite.org , a national dog bite victims’ group dedicated to reducing serious dog attacks, released data of municipalities across the country, and one instance in Canada [m
THE BITCH SLAP HEARD ROUND THE WORLD - in your desperation to scramble around to cover your tracts you posted the identical post that ban coconuts did earlier on this thread or the other one - you just proved me right beyond a shadow of a doubt - i knew you would come through for me

YOU ARE ALL THE SAME PERSON AND ALL THE CROSS PHRASING ACROSS ALL THE NAMES PROVES IT BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT TO ANY RATIONAL PERSON AND YOUR TESTINESS ABOUT IT PROVES I AM DEAD ON THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH USING SO MANY NAMES YOU FORGET WHICH ONE YOU ARE USING AND WHAT COMMON PHRASES BELONG TO WHICH ONE OF YOU AND YOU TRIP YOURSELF UP BY CROSS PHRASING ON SEVERAL DIFFERENT NAMES - NOW THAT IS TRULY PATHETIC AND YOU ARE THE BIGGEST TOOOOOL OF ALL - THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH CROSS PHRASING GOING ON TO BE COINCIDENTAL AND SO IS ALL THE SIMULTANEOUS STARTING AND STOPPING OF POSTING - YOU ALL ARE ONE BIG FAKE - AND I WOULDN'T HAVE PUT IT ALL TOGETHER IF YOU HADN'T SENT ME ON THE HUNT - YOU COOKED YOU OWN GOOSE - GOTTA LOVE IT - WHILE YOU WERE TRYING TO DISCREDIT ME ALL YOU DID WAS TOTALLY DISCREDIT YOURSELF AND NOW ANYTHING YOU SAY IS ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS - AND YOUR TESTINESS PROVES IT - UNTIL YOU PICK A NAME AND STICK WITH IT I WILL NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF YOUR BS ANYMORE EXCEPT WITH THIS POST - YOU USE A PROXY SERVER THAT IS OBVIOUS


http://www.topix.com/forum/city/massena-ny/T0QTD7NMP65HPM45J

No comments:

Post a Comment