Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Unethical Website of the Month: Dogsbite.Org

group shot
This despicable website, created by phobics, liars, fools and bigots to promote dog breed prejudice and persecution of responsible dog owners, is discredited by the vast, vast  majority of dog experts, breeders, and people with any knowledge of dogs. It is useful in a way, in that its rhetoric mirrors that of the anti-Jewish, final solution advocates of the Nazi regime, and the most virulent American racists, like the KKK. (A dog breed is exactly like a human race.) It also apes the logical fallacies of those who want to ban guns or engage in racial profiling.
Although a mass of data and history proves that pit bull-related breeds are no more inherently dangerous than any powerful breed and arguably less, Dogsbite.Org is leading a vendetta against both the breeds and lawful, loving owners, reasoning that dogfighting uses pit bull-type breeds, and pit bulls used for fighting are more likely to be dangerous (as any dog so abused  may be), so to kill two birds with one stone, it makes sense to wipe out not just any individual dangerous dog of the type but any dog that is a hybrid of the a “pit bull breed” and any dog that looks like what people think is a “pit bull”, in part because there is no such breed as “pit bull.”
Thus because some “pit bulls” are abused, all should be exterminated.This is essentially the argument of the unethical people at PETA, which announced that it is supporting DogsBite.Org with the batty, but no more so than many of  their positions, argument that we need to destroy the dogs in order to save them. 
Pretending that there is some dog-monster known as a The Pit Bull  is just one of the lies (or examples of reckless ignorance)  perpetrated by hysteric    and her deadly band of anti-dogowner fanatics on their website. Denver’s infamous pit bull ban, like Lynn, defines the “breed” as “an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one of those breeds.” This rigged methodology renders the statistics repeatedly cited by anti-pit bull bigots obvious nonsense. When one compares one distinct breed to many or more by falsely representing them as one breed, then it’s not hard to show that the fake breed is disproportionately aggressive. Says the site: “If it looks like a pitbull, then it is one.” It is because of this kind of “thinking” that my American Bull Dog-owning friend is forced to buy exorbitant insurance,  move, or have his family’s gentle companion killed.
Except that his dog is not a member of any of the breeds fairly belonging into the category called “pit bulls,” which are all terrier mixes.  There is no terrier in a bull dog.  Never mind, though: this is about hysteria, fear-mongering,  legislators who care more about votes than they do about fairness or dogs, official ignorance, and cowardice. This is another of DogsBite’s abundant lies: it claims that most people can identify a pit bull accurately. Even most dog owners are lousy at identifying breeds, and phobics, as well as people who have no experience with dogs, often can’t identify any breeds beyond beagles, Lassie, German Shepherds and maybe chihuahuas.
More people asked me if my English Mastiff was a pit bull than ever identified her correctly. I’ve owned Jack Russell Terriers for 25 years, and more people have asked me if they were pit bulls (actually, they are a lot closer to pit bulls than a mastiff is, or an American bulldog) over that time than identified their ( wonderful, merry, loving and frighteningly smart) breed correctly. The tendency of journalists and police to mistakenly attribute attacks to pit bulls is well-documented, but the website just denies it. It also falsely claims that the American Kennel Club has tried to confuse the public by re-naming breeds in order to disguise what really are pit bulls. The AKC breeds lumped into the imaginary pit bull category all predate pit bull hysteria. When I was growing up, everyone was terrified of Doberman Pinschers (another loyal, intelligent, loving breed.)
The misguided, unfeeling, reveling in ignorance fools who man this website share responsibility for the pain and misery that thousands of families have had to experience when their loving pets and companions have been taken from them by a local government and gassed simply because killing them is part of the warped pit bull “final solution.” Dogsbite.Org deals in bad statistics, debunked fallacies and anti-dog propaganda that has turned into cruel legislation in communities all over the country. Their tactics succeed because craven political hacks would rather kill harmless pets than risk losing the votes of PETA members, dog breed ignoramuses and bigots.
I’ve written a lot on this topic. This isn’t even a close call on the facts. Most of all, you should view the heart-breaking documentary, Beyond the Myth.
If  friends start repeating the DogsBite lies, introduce them to an American Pit Bull TerrierAmerican Staffordshire Terrier,  Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any mixture thereof. I can take my Jack Russell to a dog park in Arlington, Virginia, where, on any nice day, between 10 and 30 of these terrific, playful, obedient dogs will be romping happily and harmlessly among other breeds, large and small, and young children. The key fact is that none of the owners are dogfighters, drug dealers or Michael Vick.
UPDATEAnd then there’s this…
_______________________
Sources: Huffington PostSalon


Sunday, 15 May 2016

Dogsbite.org are not legitimate victims advocates?


LikeShow more reactions
Comment

The fact is the woman that created dogsbite has an axe to grind with pit bulls and it shows on her website which is little more then an anti pit bull propaganda machine disguised as a public safety orientated community focused dog bite and safety educational tool concentrating on victims advocacy.

There's not one animal expert on their payroll or board and it shows just check out this case below.


Fatal pit bull attack, Eugene Smith




Eugene Smith



87-years old | Frederick, Maryland

Eugene Smith, 87-years old, was fatally attacked by his family pit bull while taking down his Christmas tree. The dog was still viciously attacking him when Frederick County deputies, Frederick police officers and animal control arrived. Authorities were able to quickly contain the dog. Smith was taken to Frederick Memorial Hospital with severe injuries. He was pronounced dead on arrival. Smith lived at the Stonehouse Road home with his son and his son's fiancée. The family adopted the male pit bull from an unnamed person or rescue seven months earlier. The dog's former owner, who had owned the animal for about three years in a neighboring county, had adopted the dog from a Baltimore area rescue group. At the time of the fatal attack, the 84-pound pit bull was neutered and 4 or 5 years old. Frederick County Animal Control euthanized the dog after the attack. Smith, nicknamed "Smitty," spent his life as a tanker truck driver who delivered milk to farms and creameries in Frederick for nearly 60 years. [source citations]
Date of death:January 7, 2015Chained:No
Breed of dog:Pit bullRelationship to dog:Family
Sex of dog:MaleOwner of dog:Victim
Spay/Neuter:YesMultiple dogs:No
On/Off property:OnCriminal charges:No

You can see the the extent of their investigations when the post is littered with...... 

" the family adopted the pit bull from an unnamed person or rescue some months earlier"

So it's unclear how they came into possession of the dog in the first place.

"the dogs former owner who had owned the dog for about three years had adopted the dog from a Baltimore area rescue group"

So you know the dogs owner now but you said the dog was adopted from an unnamed person or rescue at the start?

2015 dog bite fatality citations ::

Dog bite-related fatality citations are gathered through news reports at the time of the occurrence or located through Internet archival services. Copies of news articles are available upon request.


Not even one of the links supplied on the dogsbite site actually take you to anything related to this victims death and as you can see they refer to media reports as "Citations"?????

These are their source "citations" which consist of nothing but useless media links as none of them work try for yourself.


  • Ike Wilson, "85-year-old still delivering milk in 18-wheel trailer," The Frederick News-Post, January 28, 2013 (http://www.fredericknewspost.com/)
  • "Frederick Co. Man Eugene Smith Mauled to Death by Family Pit Bull," NBC Washington, January 7, 2015 (http://www.nbcwashington.com)
  • Clarence Williams, "Frederick man mauled, killed by his own dog as he took down the family Christmas tree," Washington Post, January 7, 2015 (http://www.washingtonpost.com)
  • "Frederick man fatally attacked by pit bull," WUSA 9, January 7, 2015 (http://www.wusa9.com)
  • "Elderly Md. Man Mauled to Death by Family Pit Bull," CBS Washington, January 7, 2015 (http://washington.cbslocal.com/)
  • "Rescued Pit Bull Kills Owner, 87, As He Takes Down Christmas Tree, Dog Euthanized," Inquisitr, January 7, 2015 (http://www.inquisitr.com)
  • Paige Jones, "87-year-old Frederick man dies after being attacked by family's pit bull," The Frederick News-Post, January 8, 2015 (http://www.fredericknewspost.com)
  • "Md. dog attack victim loved animals," WUSA 8, January 7, 2015 (http://www.wusa9.com)
  • (Update) Paige Jones, "87-year-old Frederick man dies after being attacked by family's pit bull," The Frederick News-Post, January 8, 2015 (http://www.fredericknewspost.com/)
  • Jeremy Arias and Paige Jones, "Animal Control: Pit bull that killed 87-year old Frederick man had no prior history," The Frederick News-Post, January 9, 2015 (http://www.fredericknewspost.com/)
  • "Dog fatally attacks man taking down Christmas tree," WBAL-TV, January 9, 2015 (http://www.wbaltv.com/)
  • "Investigation continues in fatal pit bull attack," Herald Mail Media, January 12, 2015 (http://www.heraldmailmedia.com/)
  • Dan Rodricks, "In Frederick, a tragic reminder of pit bull ruling," Baltimore Sun, January 10, 2015 (http://www.baltsun.com/)

When you click on copies of news articles are available upon request it leads you to this page and try for yourself none of their links work?


Contact us ::

DogsBite.org is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity organization dedicated to reducing serious dog attacks. We are located in Austin, Texas. Please contact us via email or snail mail.

Email

General Information
Media and Press
Attorney Directory
Safety Brochures
Abusive and/or deceitful emails are subject to being published in full. Learn more.

Address

DogsBite.org
P.O. Box 12443
Austin, TX 78711


So there was absolutely no investigation regarding the dog involved despite the sketchy details they've posted and it's a well known fact that shelter staff have real issues visually identifying the breed of any given breed

1.

A New Study discussing the reliability of visual breed identification ..

"In a new study that was just released, researcher Victoria Voith once again exposes the challenges of identifying dominant breeds of mixed breed dogs, even by "experts" in the field."

2.


"Breed identification is used in dog adoption, lost and found, and regulation. In animal shelters, staff members usually assign breed according to what relinquishing owners report their dogs to be or based on appearance alone since most dogs arrive without a known pedigree."

3.


"Pit bulls: Laws are passed banning them. Landlords and HOAs frequently prohibit them. Many shelters refuse to adopt them out. Individuals often fear them. But can anyone accurately identify them?
In a University of Florida study conducted at four different animal shelters and published in the November 2015 issue of The Veterinary Journal, researchers looked at visual identification of dogs as being of the “pit bull” type by shelter veterinarians and staff members."

4.

"Highlights

Animal shelter staff and veterinarians are frequently expected to guess the breed of dogs based on appearance alone.
Even when observing the same dogs at the same time, shelter staff had only moderate agreement with breed designations.
One in five dogs genetically identified with pit bull heritage breeds were missed by all shelter staff.
One in three dogs lacking DNA for pit bull heritage breeds were labeled pit bull-type dogs by at least one staff member.
Lack of consistency among shelter staff indicates that visual identification of pit bull-type dogs is unreliable."

5.

Dog breed identification is no basis for shelter policy.


The study, underwritten by Maddie’s Fund and reported on the Maddie's Fund website,1 dealt with the limited problem of identifying "pit bull" dogs in four Florida animal shelters. Shelter staff and veterinarians regularly assign breed descriptors to the dogs in their care; but, the authors asked, what are the reliability and repeatability of these breed assignments? They developed their project based upon this question, to test the hypothesis that agreement among staff members regarding identification of “pit bull” dogs would be poor, and that there would be poor agreement between staff breed identifications and DNA breed signatures." 


The fact is this dog could have been any breed and this is just one of many similar cases where dogsbite claims are made without any evidence substantiating their assertions that this dog was actually a "pit bull"?

The fact is dogsbite has recently won the most disreputable web site in the internet and is it any wonder with dodgy unsubstantiated claims verging on blatant lies?

Dogsbite enjoys absolutely no support from either the animal experts organizations of the world with all rejecting their so called statistics as little more then propaganda.


more to come.....